Ethiopia 2025: U.S. Report Flags Reforms and Corridor Risks











The U.S. State Department’s 2025 Investment Climate Statement on Ethiopia paints a picture of a country pulling in two directions at once: a government eager to court foreign capital and modernise its economy, and a political and regulatory environment that repeatedly unsettles the very investors it hopes to attract.

Reform Momentum and Market Appeal

The report credits Ethiopia with a reform tempo unmatched in decades. In July 2024 the government abandoned its long-standing currency peg, allowing the birr to float and triggering a depreciation of more than 100%. For a brief period the official and parallel-market rates converged, easing the chronic foreign-exchange shortages that have long dogged importers and manufacturers.

This monetary liberalisation underpinned a four-year, $10.5 billion assistance package agreed with the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. The programme aims to stabilise the financial system, strengthen the independence of the National Bank of Ethiopia and deepen the domestic capital market.

Ethiopia has also relaunched the Ethiopian Securities Exchange (ESX)—a long-awaited platform for equity and debt finance—and passed laws to permit foreign banks to open branches and buy minority stakes in local lenders. Ten industrial parks have been upgraded to special-economic-zone status, with incentives designed to attract export-oriented manufacturing and agro-processing.

Add to this a population of more than 135 million, two-thirds of them under 30, and labour costs among the lowest in Africa, and the lure for foreign investors is obvious. Sectors from textiles to telecoms see a potential market and labour force of continental scale.

Structural and Political Friction

Yet Washington’s statement is equally blunt about what still deters capital. Ethiopia’s federal government has limited control outside Addis Ababa, with conflict and insecurity in the Amhara and Oromia regions restricting travel and exposing businesses to extortion by militias or local officials.

Property rights remain fragile because all land is state-owned and only leased. Courts are slow, under-resourced and prone to political interference; commercial disputes can take years to resolve. Customs regulations change without notice and tax authorities have been accused of issuing retroactive and excessive tax bills—penalties so high they sometimes exceed a firm’s annual revenue. Corruption, particularly in land allocation and public procurement, is described as a “national security threat”.

Even the flagship currency float is showing strain: by late 2024 the gap between bank rates and the parallel market had already begun to re-emerge, threatening the credibility of the reform.

The Urban “Corridor Development” Controversy

The report singles out the government’s “corridor development” projects as a vivid example of weak property protections. Launched in Addis Ababa in March 2024 and since expanded to at least 40 other cities, these projects aim to create broad urban boulevards and plazas. But implementation has been brutal: tens of thousands of residents and businesses—some foreign-owned—were expelled and their properties demolished, often with no warning and little or no compensation.

Because investors can only lease land, the government can revoke leases or reclaim property for “public purpose” with minimal legal recourse. Some firms were not demolished but found their access roads ripped up, making it impossible to operate. For the State Department, these practices amount to de facto expropriation and send a chilling signal to foreign capital.

External Trade Corridors and Geopolitical Risk

Ethiopia’s vulnerabilities are not only domestic. More than 95% of its trade moves through the Addis–Djibouti corridor, a single road-and-rail lifeline to the Red Sea. That dependence makes the economy hostage to Djibouti’s port politics and to the region’s Red Sea instability.

To diversify, the government in January 2024 signed a controversial memorandum with Somaliland to secure access to the port of Berbera and even a potential naval facility—an agreement that provoked strong objections from Somalia’s federal government and raised regional tensions.

Meanwhile, in March 2025 Ethiopia granted licences to three private multimodal logistics operators, ending the state monopoly in a bid to cut freight costs and improve reliability. These steps could eventually reduce shipping times and insurance costs, but the geopolitical and security environment remains unsettled.

Capital, Credit and Corporate Reality

Ethiopia’s banking sector is still shallow. Thirty-two commercial banks operate, two of them state-owned, and liquidity is tight; collateral requirements often reach 100% of the loan value. Real deposit rates are negative, squeezed by double-digit inflation. The state-owned Commercial Bank of Ethiopia still controls more than half of deposits and foreign exchange, leaving private banks little room to compete.

Foreign investors may now open local business accounts, but access to domestic credit in practice remains limited. The birr’s renewed black-market premium and the slow rollout of foreign-exchange bureaus mean that repatriating profits can still be difficult despite the legal guarantees.

Rule of Law and Governance

Washington notes some progress: accession to the New York Convention allows enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and new commercial benches have been created in federal courts. But enforcement of contracts remains slow, and allegations of executive interference persist.

A 2025 Asset Recovery and Unexplained Wealth Law gives authorities broad powers to seize assets deemed improperly acquired, even retroactively. Critics fear it could be used to target political opponents or legitimate investors, further undermining confidence in the rule of law.

A Calculated but Costly Opportunity

The State Department’s conclusion is unmistakable. Ethiopia offers long-term opportunity: a vast domestic market, a reform-minded macroeconomic policy, and strategic location at the Horn of Africa. Yet it also carries exceptional political and regulatory risk.

Investors must account for:

potential expropriation or disruption from urban corridor projects,

regional conflict and weak federal control,

unpredictable taxation and customs enforcement, and

continuing foreign-exchange volatility.

For American firms the message is not “stay away” but “proceed with caution”—with thorough due diligence, strong contractual protections and contingency plans. Ethiopia’s promise is undeniable, but as the 2025 U.S. Investment Climate Statement makes clear, the path from reform to reliable return is anything but straight.