From Birthrights to Aid Freezes: Ethiopia Caught in Trump’s Policy Crossfire

On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued a series of executive orders that have significant implications for both domestic and international affairs. Two notable actions include the termination of birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens and a 90-day freeze on foreign aid to all countries. These measures are poised to impact nations like Ethiopia, both in terms of their citizens residing in the U.S. and the aid they receive. Termination of Birthright Citizenship The executive order aims to end the automatic granting of U.S. citizenship to children born on American soil to non-citizen parents, including those on temporary visas or without legal status. This policy shift challenges the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which has traditionally conferred citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. Legal experts anticipate significant constitutional challenges to this order, as the Supreme Court has historically upheld birthright citizenship. For Ethiopian nationals in the U.S., this policy could have profound effects. Children born to Ethiopian parents who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents may no longer automatically acquire U.S. citizenship. This change could lead to an increase in stateless individuals, complicating their legal status and access to services. Moreover, it may deter Ethiopians from traveling to or residing in the U.S. on temporary visas, impacting educational and professional opportunities. 90-Day Freeze on Foreign Aid President Trump’s “America First” policy has led to a temporary suspension of foreign aid for 90 days, during which the administration plans to reassess and potentially restructure aid distribution. Ethiopia, a significant recipient of U.S. aid aimed at supporting economic development, healthcare, and education, stands to be directly affected by this freeze. The suspension could disrupt ongoing projects and strain Ethiopia’s efforts to address challenges such as poverty and health crises. Additionally, the uncertainty surrounding future aid allocations may hinder long-term planning and development initiatives within the country. Implications for Ethiopia The convergence of these policies presents a complex scenario for Ethiopia. The potential reduction in remittances from Ethiopians in the U.S., coupled with the suspension of foreign aid, could exacerbate economic challenges. Furthermore, Ethiopia’s geopolitical significance in the Horn of Africa means that shifts in U.S. policy could influence regional stability and development. Ethiopian policymakers may need to seek alternative partnerships and diversify sources of foreign assistance to mitigate the impact of these changes. In summary, the termination of birthright citizenship and the freeze on foreign aid represent significant shifts in U.S. policy with direct consequences for Ethiopia. The full extent of these impacts will depend on the implementation of these orders and the outcomes of anticipated legal challenges. Ethiopia will need to navigate this evolving landscape carefully, balancing domestic needs with the realities of changing international relations.

Tibor Nagy Returns to U.S. State Department with Focus on Africa and Global Affairs

Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Ambassador Tibor Nagy, has announced his return to the U.S. State Department in a temporary role that will expand beyond his established focus on Africa. Nagy, who has decades of diplomatic experience, including serving as U.S. Ambassador to Ethiopia and Guinea, is expected to bring his expertise in African affairs to address both regional and global challenges. During his time as Ambassador to Ethiopia, Nagy worked to strengthen U.S.-Ethiopia relations, focusing on issues such as economic reform, governance, and regional security. His tenure also included navigating Ethiopia’s complex political dynamics, making him a key figure in U.S. engagement in East Africa. Nagy has long emphasized the importance of fostering stability in the region as a foundation for broader peace and development. East Africa currently faces significant challenges, where Nagy’s experience may play a pivotal role: Nagy’s new role is likely to address not only regional issues but also the broader implications of global powers’ growing presence in Africa. China’s economic and military influence in the region, particularly through its base in Djibouti, presents strategic challenges, while Russia’s expanding engagement in Africa has added another layer of complexity to U.S. policy considerations. The U.S. will need to balance these dynamics while fostering partnerships with African nations on development, governance, and security initiatives. Nagy’s experience in navigating such challenges positions him to contribute meaningfully to these efforts. Tibor Nagy’s return to the State Department reflects the U.S. government’s recognition of the strategic importance of Africa in global affairs. His expertise, particularly in East Africa, will likely be instrumental in addressing pressing issues while supporting long-term stability and growth in the region. While specific details of his role remain undisclosed, Nagy’s background in diplomacy and deep understanding of Africa’s challenges provide a strong foundation for his contributions to U.S. foreign policy. His work is expected to focus on fostering peace, security, and economic opportunities in Africa while aligning with broader U.S. global objectives.

Ethiopia Approves Landmark Property Tax Law Amid Debate on Economic Impact

Addis Ababa, January 14, 2025 – The House of People’s Representatives has officially passed a new Property Tax Proclamation, introducing a landmark tax policy that imposes levies on urban land, buildings, and land improvements. The law is expected to bolster municipal revenue and finance infrastructure development, but it has also sparked heated debate regarding its potential impact on taxpayers and economic inequality. The law, initially introduced in June 2024, was part of a broader government effort to expand the tax base, including proposed amendments to value-added tax (VAT) and excise tax laws. After undergoing scrutiny by the Standing Committee on Planning, Budget, and Finance Affairs, and following public consultations held in December 2024, the final version of the bill was passed with ten votes in favor and four against during Parliament’s 15th regular session. Under the newly approved Property Tax Proclamation, the taxable amount for any property is set at 25% of either its market value or its replacement value. The tax rate for land usage rights ranges from 0.2% to 1% of the annual taxable amount, while the tax on buildings and land improvements is set between 0.1% and 1% of their taxable value. Municipalities are now authorized to collect revenue directly through property taxes, granting them increased financial autonomy to fund essential services and urban development projects. During the parliamentary session, Desalegn Wodaje, Chairperson of the Standing Committee on Planning, Budget, and Finance Affairs, justified the need for the tax, stating: “There is a significant gap between the needs of growing urban populations and the resources available to address those needs. The increasing value of urban property is not being adequately taxed, resulting in a shortfall in government revenue. This situation contributes to economic inequality within cities.” While government officials defended the law as a necessary step toward economic modernization, it faced sharp criticism from several lawmakers, who raised concerns about the burden it could place on low- and middle-income earners. MP Bartuma Fikadu criticized the policy, stating: “The law stipulates that 25% of the market value of the land will be subject to tax. It also states that the tax amount will increase annually. This law favors the tax collector instead of considering the burden on taxpayers.” Similarly, Desalegn Chane (PhD), a representative from the National Movement of Amhara (NaMA), questioned whether the additional tax was necessary, given the government’s strong tax collection performance in the past fiscal year. “The government reported collecting 490 billion birr in taxes over the past six months. This indicates that it has the potential to collect over a trillion birr by the end of the fiscal year. This amount is sufficient to cover government expenditures without imposing additional taxes on citizens.” The proposal also raised questions about tax fairness. Ewnetu Alene, Chairperson of the Standing Committee on Democratic Affairs, voiced concerns that the law might disproportionately impact low-income earners and government employees rather than targeting large-scale property owners. “In our country, the majority of taxes are imposed on low-income individuals, particularly urban residents and government employees. Are we improving the tax system by overburdening these segments of society? Shouldn’t we instead impose higher taxes on those owning extensive land and properties to better support low-income citizens?” Ewnetu also pointed out that while some proclamations appear favorable when debated in Parliament, they often become a heavy burden when implemented in practice. Despite the concerns, government officials argue that the property tax is essential for sustainable urban development. Eyob Tekalign (PhD), State Minister for Finance, emphasized that the law is part of Ethiopia’s broader economic modernization strategy and would ultimately strengthen the financial capacities of cities. “By enabling cities to have stronger financial capacities, it will facilitate the creation of a better tax base to improve the quality of life in every city.” Furthermore, Ato Desalegn Wodaje reiterated that urban residents already contribute indirectly to infrastructure development through various fees and levies. However, he stressed that municipalities must have dedicated revenue streams to keep up with urbanization and increasing infrastructure demands. “Municipal growth and urban expansion have significantly increased the need for infrastructure investment. Relying solely on government funds to cover all development expenses is not sustainable. Cities must contribute through local taxation.” Under the new law, certain federal and regional government institutions, as well as nonprofit organizations, are exempt from the property tax. However, lawmakers questioned why religious institutions were not included in the list of exemptions. The allocation of revenue collected from the property tax also remains a point of contention. Some MPs argued that the law does not clearly define how the funds will be distributed and used for public services such as electricity, water, and urban maintenance. Additionally, stakeholders previously expressed concerns about the timing of the tax introduction, given Ethiopia’s ongoing inflationary pressures and the existing tax burden on citizens. With the law now in effect, municipalities will begin assessing and collecting property taxes in urban areas. The new revenue stream is expected to support infrastructure projects, improve public services, and finance urban expansion initiatives. However, critics warn that without proper safeguards, the law could deepen economic inequality and disproportionately impact lower-income homeowners. Moving forward, local and regional governments will have the flexibility to adjust and implement the law based on their specific needs. As Ethiopia continues to modernize its tax system, the success of the property tax will depend on fair implementation, transparent revenue allocation, and measures to protect vulnerable populations from excessive tax burdens.

Ethiopia and Somalia Agree to Restore Bilateral Relations

PM Abiy Ahmed and President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud Meet in Addis Ababa January 3/2017 (Ahadu Radio) Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud met today, January 3, 2017, in Addis Ababa for bilateral consultations. Following the improvement in diplomatic relations between the two countries in accordance with the Ankara Agreement; the Somali President arrived in Addis Ababa this afternoon for an official visit; Prime Minister Abiy welcomed the President at Bole International Airport. “I would like to inform you that the President of the Federal Republic of Somalia, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, has come to Ethiopia for an official visit,” he said in a post on his social media page. Following this, the two leaders discussed common issues and issued a joint statement after the discussion. In their statement, it was noted that the leaders held a constructive discussion to strengthen the brotherhood and relations between the peoples of the two countries, as well as; the need for strong cooperation based on mutual trust, confidence and respect for regional stability. It was also stated that they agreed to restore bilateral relations and ensure full diplomatic representation in their respective cities; and agreed to work together to improve regional relations, create mutual understanding and promote common development. They also stressed the importance of strengthening economic cooperation, trade and investment between the two countries. The discussions highlighted the need for Ethiopia and Somalia to continue to work together to strengthen their security and stability cooperation; the joint statement also noted that they discussed the growing threat posed by militant groups in the region. The leaders of the two countries agreed to strengthen their cooperation in regional peace and stability by providing guidance to their security institutions. The countries also agreed to establish strong economic cooperation, expand infrastructure that will facilitate trade and ensure mutual prosperity. The leaders expressed their commitment to the implementation of the Ankara Agreement; they noted that the agreement was born from the spirit of friendship and partnership between the countries. The joint statement indicated that they agreed to expedite the start of technical negotiations as stipulated in the agreement. They reaffirmed their commitment to the Ankara agreement in a spirit of friendship and partnership; and agreed to expedite the start of technical negotiations as stipulated in the agreement. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δdocument.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime())

Somalia’s President to Visit Addis Ababa Tomorrow, Marking First Trip Since Ankara Agreement

Addis Ababa, January 12, 2025 – Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud is set to visit Addis Ababa tomorrow, marking his first official trip to Ethiopia since the signing of the Ankara Agreement in December 2024. This visit signals a thaw in diplomatic tensions between the two neighbors, following months of strained relations over Ethiopia’s controversial memorandum with Somaliland. The Ankara Agreement, brokered by Turkey, paved the way for renewed negotiations between Ethiopia and Somalia, particularly regarding Ethiopia’s access to the sea. The accord reaffirmed Somalia’s territorial integrity while opening the door for technical discussions on maritime cooperation. President Mohamud’s visit is expected to focus on strengthening bilateral relations, discussing regional security, and advancing economic cooperation. Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed is likely to welcome the Somali leader, with high-level meetings planned to reinforce mutual trust and address lingering concerns. This visit is seen as a diplomatic breakthrough, marking a shift from recent hostilities to constructive engagement. Analysts believe that both nations recognize the strategic importance of collaboration for regional stability and development in the Horn of Africa. The visit also underscores Turkey’s growing role as a mediator in East African diplomacy, following its successful facilitation of the Ankara Agreement. More updates to follow as the visit unfolds. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δdocument.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime())

U.S. Urges Ethiopia to Remove Implicated Officials—Ambassador Beth Van Schaack Calls for Accountability

In a recent press briefing organized by the U.S. Department of State’s Africa Regional Media Hub, Ambassador Beth Van Schaack, the U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice, discussed Ethiopia’s ongoing efforts to establish a transitional justice framework. The briefing focused on Ethiopia’s potential to address historical grievances and ongoing challenges. Ambassador Van Schaack emphasized the importance of justice processes tailored to the unique experiences and needs of affected communities. During her visit to Addis Ababa, she engaged with governmental actors, civil society organizations, and international experts to discuss Ethiopia’s emerging transitional justice initiatives. Central to these discussions was Ethiopia’s effort to draft and implement five pieces of legislation addressing accountability, truth-telling, institutional reforms, and reparations. The Ambassador acknowledged the Ethiopian government’s willingness to incorporate international feedback on these drafts. “Every survivor and every community has different needs, which is why it’s essential that their voices be a part of the process,” said Van Schaack. She highlighted the role of transitional justice in fostering peace and stability through transparent and inclusive mechanisms. The Ambassador’s visit also included participation in a conference at the African Union, where youth leaders and transitional justice experts from across Africa shared insights. Participants from The Gambia presented lessons from their Truth, Reconciliation, and Reparations Commission (TRRC), which combined public truth-telling with plans for a hybrid court to address atrocities under the Jammeh regime. South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was also referenced as an example of long-term efforts to reconcile and reform institutions after apartheid. Ethiopia’s journey, similarly, will require sustained commitment to ensure justice mechanisms are effectively implemented. Ethiopia’s transitional justice process is rooted in the aftermath of recent conflicts, particularly in the Tigray, Amhara, and Oromia regions. The 2022 Cessation of Hostilities Agreement included a commitment to transitional justice. However, concerns remain regarding civic space limitations and reports of ongoing violence. Van Schaack noted that comprehensive justice efforts depend on resolving these challenges. She called for measures such as removing individuals implicated in abuses from positions of power and publicly acknowledging past atrocities. These actions, she suggested, would strengthen the credibility of Ethiopia’s transitional justice process. External experts from Colombia and South Africa have contributed perspectives on truth-telling, accountability, and reparations. Van Schaack cited Colombia’s holistic approach to transitional justice as particularly relevant to Ethiopia’s context. Ambassador Van Schaack’s remarks highlighted the growing role of African nations in advancing transitional justice. The international community, including the United States, has expressed readiness to support Ethiopia’s efforts, provided the process remains transparent and inclusive. Ethiopia faces the dual challenge of addressing past atrocities while fostering lasting peace and justice. The success of its transitional justice process could set a precedent for other nations grappling with similar issues. As Ethiopia continues on this path, the global community will be observing its progress toward accountability, reconciliation, and sustainable peace. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δdocument.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );

President Erdoğan to Undertake Working Visit to Ethiopia and Somalia in 2025 Following Historic Agreement

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is set to undertake a working visit to Ethiopia and Somalia in the first months of 2025. The visit follows a breakthrough hailed as a “historic agreement” between Ethiopia and Somalia, brokered by President Erdoğan, which resolved a year-long diplomatic feud between the two nations. The agreement, reached after eight hours of intensive talks in Ankara, is expected to pave the way for renewed peace and cooperation in the Horn of Africa. Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud arrived in Ankara for the third round of Turkish-mediated talks, following unsuccessful negotiations in July and October. Addressing a joint press conference, President Erdoğan described the deal as a significant step toward a new chapter of collaboration between Ethiopia and Somalia. “This agreement marks the beginning of a new era based on mutual understanding and shared goals,” Erdoğan stated. He expressed confidence that the accord would resolve Ethiopia’s need for access to the sea while respecting Somalia’s sovereignty. The conflict, which stemmed from Ethiopia’s controversial deal with Somaliland—a breakaway region of Somalia—over a coastal port and military base, had escalated tensions in the region. The agreement aims to address Ethiopia’s desire for “safe and reliable access to the sea,” a long-standing issue for the landlocked country. Prime Minister Abiy emphasized the importance of the deal for Ethiopia’s regional development, noting, “This will benefit not only Ethiopia but also our neighbors and the region at large.” Somali President Mohamud also welcomed the deal, calling it a resolution to their differences and reaffirming Somalia’s commitment to cooperation. “We are ready to work with Ethiopia’s leadership and people to build a future of shared prosperity,” he stated. Turkey’s role as a mediator has been crucial, with President Erdoğan personally overseeing the talks. This agreement highlights Turkey’s growing influence in the Horn of Africa, where it has worked to foster stability and collaboration. The upcoming visit by President Erdoğan marks another milestone in strengthening Turkey’s diplomatic and economic ties with both Ethiopia and Somalia, offering hope for a more cooperative future in the region as 2024 draws to a close. Thank you Brother President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan for bringing the leaders of these two countries of fraternal peoples back to their senses. If not for colonialism, these neighbors of the same branch of humanity, would have been citizens of one country but it left with one loaded with contempt and the other one with mistrust. I hope your commendable effort will remain fruitful and the peoples of the two nation will live in peace and harmony. You deserve a Nobel Peace Prize for that. Masha’Allah Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δdocument.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );

Fana Broadcasting’s Documentary and Isaias Afewerki’s Interview: A Deep Dive into Ethiopia-Eritrea Relations

Fana Broadcasting’s recent documentary The Asmara Government’s Matter – የራሷ አሮባት has ignited heated debate by presenting a scathing critique of Eritrean President Isaias Afewerki and his governance. The documentary, framed as a response to Isaias’ recent interview on Eritrean state television, highlights the stark divergence in the narratives promoted by the Eritrean president and Ethiopia’s state-affiliated media. By dissecting both Isaias’ statements and Fana’s rebuttals, this analysis explores the growing tension between Ethiopia and Eritrea while shedding light on broader regional dynamics. President Isaias Afewerki’s Interview: Key Points In his televised interview, President Isaias discussed various issues, presenting himself as a statesman advocating for regional stability. Key topics included: Fana Broadcasting’s Documentary: A Counterpoint In response to Isaias’ interview, Fana Broadcasting’s documentary delivers a pointed critique, challenging the Eritrean president’s assertions while framing his governance as a major impediment to regional progress. Below, Fana’s major points are analyzed in relation to Isaias’ claims. Isaias’ Claim:Ethiopia’s 1994 constitution is divisive, foreign-imposed, and a root cause of conflict. Fana’s Counterpoint:Fana criticizes Isaias for commenting on Ethiopia’s governance while leading a country without a functional constitution or democratic institutions. The documentary underscores the irony of Isaias, who has ruled without elections for 30 years, denouncing Ethiopia’s constitutional framework. Eritrea’s political system, devoid of checks and balances, is contrasted with Ethiopia’s attempts at federalism and nation-building. Isaias’ Claim:Eritrea is committed to promoting peace and stability in the Horn of Africa and beyond. Fana’s Counterpoint:Fana portrays Eritrea as a destabilizing force, accusing it of training militants to disrupt Ethiopia’s democratic processes. The documentary points to the tripartite agreement with Somalia and Egypt as an alignment aimed at countering Ethiopia’s regional influence, particularly regarding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). Eritrea’s role in supporting TPLF rockets during the Tigray war is highlighted as evidence of its complicity in regional destabilization. Isaias’ Claim:Eritrea is undertaking significant infrastructure projects to improve living conditions. Fana’s Counterpoint:Fana dismisses these claims, emphasizing Eritrea’s economic stagnation and lack of basic services. The report highlights outdated infrastructure, rationed internet access, and an economy still reliant on conscription labor. Ethiopia’s achievements, such as the GERD and its rapid economic growth, are framed as a stark contrast to Eritrea’s lack of progress. Isaias’ Claim:The agreement with Somalia and Egypt promotes trust and regional stability. Fana’s Counterpoint:Fana interprets the agreement as a strategic alliance aimed at isolating Ethiopia, particularly in light of Ethiopia’s ambitions for Red Sea access. The documentary underscores Ethiopia’s frustration with Eritrea’s perceived alignment with Egypt’s anti-GERD agenda, framing Eritrea as an obstacle to regional cooperation rather than a stabilizing force. Isaias’ Silence:The president did not address Eritrea’s human rights record or the refugee crisis. Fana’s Highlight:The documentary condemns Isaias’ oppressive policies, which have forced over one-fifth of Eritreans into exile. It describes Eritrea as a nation where citizens live under surveillance, with no hope for political or economic reform. Military conscription, described as modern-day slavery, is cited as a key driver of the refugee crisis. Isaias’ Claim:Eritrea is navigating global power dynamics cautiously, seeking constructive relations while opposing foreign interference. Fana’s Counterpoint:Fana casts doubt on Isaias’ intentions, accusing him of using anti-foreign rhetoric to justify Eritrea’s isolation. The documentary highlights Eritrea’s historical tensions with the United States and its reliance on narratives of external sabotage to deflect attention from domestic failures. Evolving Ethiopia-Eritrea Relations Fana’s documentary reflects a broader shift in Ethiopia’s relationship with Eritrea. The Ethiopia-Eritrea peace accord, once celebrated as a historic reconciliation, has given way to growing tensions. Key factors include: Ethiopia’s Push for Red Sea Access:Ethiopia’s announcement of its intent to secure seaport access has heightened friction, with Eritrea viewing this move as a challenge to its regional dominance. Post-Pretoria Agreement Dynamics:The Tigray conflict initially aligned Eritrea with Ethiopia’s federal government, but the Pretoria peace deal marked a turning point. Eritrea’s exclusion from subsequent peace processes and its lingering tensions with Ethiopia’s government have strained ties. Ethiopia’s Growing Regional Leadership:Ethiopia’s economic and infrastructural achievements, symbolized by the GERD, position it as a leader in East Africa. Fana’s documentary underscores Ethiopia’s commitment to constitutional governance and regional cooperation, contrasting this with Eritrea’s authoritarianism and isolationism. Conclusion: A Battle of Narratives The interplay between Isaias’ interview and Fana’s documentary reveals a growing battle of narratives between Ethiopia and Eritrea. While Isaias positions Eritrea as a stabilizing force and criticizes Ethiopia’s governance, Fana’s documentary dismantles this portrayal, presenting Eritrea as a nation mired in authoritarian stagnation and regional disruption. This media exchange reflects deeper tensions in Ethiopia-Eritrea relations, driven by divergent visions for regional leadership and governance. As Ethiopia continues to assert itself as a regional powerhouse, Eritrea’s role and relationship with its neighbor remain fraught with challenges. Fana’s documentary, in its bold critique, signals Ethiopia’s frustration and intent to distance itself from a partner increasingly seen as an obstacle to progress. The people of Eritrea have been living under this BRUTAL DICTATOR for over 30 years. I hope somebody kills him or he flees the country like Bashar. All I can say is the leaders of these neighbors can fight each other all day and all night they want but they shouldn’t even think about starting another destructive war between the two nations. One can flop his blabber mouth at his comfy palace in Piccolo Roma trying to be Mao’s incarnate and the other one can move his jaws at his lush crib in Addis/Finfinne trying to be a protégé of Aristotle but they should bear in mind that I and the rest of the world will hold both accountable for the loss of Allah Blessed human lives in a stupid war they may be itching now to ignite. Don’t even think about it. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δdocument.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );

PM Arrives in Kazan, Russia for Ethiopia’s First Participation at BRICS Summit

The 16th BRICS Summit, which begins today in Kazan, Russia, is a milestone for Ethiopia as it marks the country’s first-ever participation in this powerful international forum. Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed (Dr.) arrived in Kazan to represent Ethiopia, a nation recently invited to join BRICS—a group that includes major emerging economies and is recognized for its growing influence in global affairs. This first-time attendance reflects Ethiopia’s aspirations to strengthen its role on the world stage, particularly in economic cooperation and geopolitical decision-making. BRICS, originally formed in 2006, consists of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, and is viewed as a counterbalance to traditional Western-dominated alliances like the G7. The group’s strategic importance is growing, as it continues to expand its membership and develop a vision for greater cooperation among developing economies. Ethiopia, along with other new members, will be part of this evolving bloc, providing the country with a platform to enhance its economic partnerships and political standing. Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed is joined by other world leaders at the summit, including Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, President of the United Arab Emirates; Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi; and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Additionally, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, and other high-ranking officials from across the globe are traveling to Kazan to participate in the discussions. Their presence underscores the growing importance of BRICS as a forum for emerging markets to collaborate on global challenges. As Ethiopia steps into this significant diplomatic and economic circle, the BRICS Summit is expected to cover a range of crucial topics that will directly impact Ethiopia’s economic trajectory. Key among these discussions will be the exploration of a BRICS digital payment system, designed to facilitate trade among member countries and reduce reliance on traditional global financial systems dominated by the West. This initiative could benefit Ethiopia by making cross-border trade more accessible and cost-effective, helping to stimulate economic growth and job creation. Moreover, the summit will explore options for conducting business in national currencies, which aligns with Ethiopia’s broader economic goals of reducing foreign exchange pressures and improving the stability of its financial system. This could open new trade routes with BRICS members like China and India, Ethiopia’s major trade partners, and create opportunities for Ethiopian industries to expand their reach into new markets. Beyond economics, the summit will also address governance issues and explore the potential for new “partner country” statuses within BRICS, which could provide Ethiopia with additional avenues for collaboration. Discussions on stimulating trade, enhancing investment, and addressing global geopolitical challenges will be front and center, giving Ethiopia the opportunity to engage with and learn from the experiences of other BRICS members. For Ethiopia, the significance of joining BRICS extends beyond economic benefits—it represents an opportunity to diversify its international partnerships and assert its influence in shaping the future of the developing world. By aligning with BRICS, Ethiopia positions itself within a group of nations that advocate for a multipolar world, where global power is more evenly distributed, and developing economies have a stronger voice in international decision-making. As Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed takes part in his first BRICS Summit, Ethiopia’s participation signals a new chapter in the country’s foreign relations, marked by enhanced diplomacy, economic cooperation, and shared development goals. This summit is a critical moment for Ethiopia to build alliances, foster economic resilience, and strengthen its global influence within the BRICS framework. How come Eritrea and Somalia were not invited? Eritrea has the highest GDP(PPP) in Africa and 2nd highest in the world just below Singapore. Somalia is the most powerful and industrialized country in Somalia itself. How dare you Putin? Eritrea was the one that emancipated Ethiopia from fascism in 1896 and 1941. Eritrea was the one that taught Ethiopia how to add, subtract, multiply and divide. Eritrea was the one that taught Ethiopia even how to talk and write by inventing the Amhara and Oromo languages. I’m gonna go there to Kazan and picket in front of the summit hall demanding the inclusion of Eritrea and Somalia and my homeboy el-Sisi will back me up on that one. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δdocument.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime())