Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed Arrives in Beijing for FOCAC Summit

Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed Arrives in Beijing for FOCAC Summit Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed arrived in Beijing this morning to participate in the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) summit, according to the Office of the Prime Minister. The summit, taking place from September 4-6, brings together several African heads of state and government who have already convened in the Chinese capital. The FOCAC summit will focus on strengthening China-Africa relations, with particular attention to development initiatives across the continent. Key topics on the agenda include economic cooperation, infrastructure development, trade partnerships, and investment opportunities aimed at fostering mutual growth between China and African nations. China has been a significant partner in Africa’s development over the years, with its investments playing a vital role in infrastructure, technology, and other sectors. The summit is expected to provide a platform for further discussions on collaborative projects that could contribute to the long-term economic growth of participating African countries. As discussions unfold, outcomes from the summit are likely to shape future engagement between China and African nations, with a focus on shared interests in sustainable development and economic progress. Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed arrived in Beijing this morning to participate in the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) summit, according to the Office of the Prime Minister. The summit, taking place from September 4-6, brings together several African heads of state and government who have already convened in the Chinese capital. The FOCAC summit will focus on strengthening China-Africa relations, with particular attention to development initiatives across the continent. Key topics on the agenda include economic cooperation, infrastructure development, trade partnerships, and investment opportunities aimed at fostering mutual growth between China and African nations. China has been a significant partner in Africa’s development over the years, with its investments playing a vital role in infrastructure, technology, and other sectors. The summit is expected to provide a platform for further discussions on collaborative projects that could contribute to the long-term economic growth of participating African countries. As discussions unfold, outcomes from the summit are likely to shape future engagement between China and African nations, with a focus on shared interests in sustainable development and economic progress.

Djibouti Offers Ethiopia Management of a Port to Ease Regional Tensions

Djibouti Offers Ethiopia Management of a Port to Ease Regional Tensions Djibouti’s Foreign Minister, Mahmoud Ali Yusuf, has revealed that his country has proposed a significant offer to Ethiopia in a bid to reduce tensions in the Horn of Africa. In a special interview with BBC Focus on Africa, the foreign minister discussed the possibility of Ethiopia directly managing one of Djibouti’s ports. Access to the Sea for Ethiopia Foreign Minister Yusuf stated that Djibouti has offered Ethiopia the option to “fully manage” the Tajura port, which is located hundreds of kilometers away from Ethiopia. This proposal is intended to alleviate Ethiopia’s longstanding issue of being landlocked and lacking direct access to a seaport. The foreign minister emphasized that this move could help ease tensions with Somalia, which have arisen due to Ethiopia’s sea gate communication agreement with Somaliland, a region that has declared itself an independent country. The Proposal and Its Strategic Importance The proposal includes allowing Ethiopia to manage not only the port of Tajura but also a newly constructed corridor that would enable Ethiopia to access the sea. This offer was reportedly presented to Ethiopia by Djibouti’s President, Omar Guleh. However, the foreign minister did not provide detailed information on which government body would handle the agreement, when it would be implemented, or the specific terms of the proposed port management deal. Diplomatic Implications and Future Discussions Despite the lack of specifics, the minister mentioned that the proposal would be a topic of discussion between the leaders of Ethiopia and Djibouti at the upcoming China-Africa summit. This development comes as Ethiopia has been using Tajura port, which was constructed at a cost of $90 million, for the past four years. The port is strategically important for exporting potash reserves, as well as coal and iron cargoes from the Afar region. Regional Tensions and Economic Considerations Ethiopia, a landlocked nation, currently relies heavily on the port of Djibouti for its import and export trade, costing the country over $1 billion annually. The signing of an agreement between Ethiopia and Somaliland, which has declared independence, has further strained Ethiopia’s relations with Somalia, creating diplomatic tension. The foreign minister urged that both countries should resolve their differences through dialogue, with the support of Djibouti, Kenya, and other regional players. Broader Security Concerns The minister also expressed concerns about the broader security implications for the region. He highlighted the ongoing threat from the Yemeni Houthi armed group in the Gulf of Aden and Bab al-Mandab province, stressing that unresolved tensions in neighboring countries pose a significant threat to Djibouti, despite its stability. He called on both Ethiopia and Somalia to refrain from inflammatory statements and actions that could escalate tensions. Military Cooperation and External Influences Adding to the complexity of the situation, Egypt, which has been in a longstanding dispute with Ethiopia over the construction of the Great Renaissance Dam, has signed a military cooperation agreement with Somalia. This move, which includes the delivery of weapons to Somalia, has further heightened tensions in the Horn of Africa. Ethiopia has warned that it will not remain passive in the face of actions that could destabilize the region and accused the Somali government of collaborating with foreign forces that seek to create instability. The Somaliland Controversy The memorandum of understanding that Ethiopia signed with Somaliland to secure a 20-kilometer coastline has particularly angered Somalia, leading to significant regional tensions. In response, Somaliland officials have suggested that Ethiopia could be the first country in the world to recognize Somaliland as an independent nation. This has led Somalia to sever diplomatic ties with Ethiopia and bring the issue before the UN Security Council, labeling it as an invasion and a violation of its sovereignty. The situation in the Horn of Africa remains delicate, with multiple nations involved in a complex web of diplomatic, economic, and military interests. Djibouti’s offer to allow Ethiopia to manage the Tajura port could be a key step in easing tensions, but much will depend on the forthcoming discussions and the broader regional context.

Ethiopia Appoints Teshome Shunde as New Ambassador to Its Consulate in Somaliland

Ethiopia Appoints Teshome Shunde as New Ambassador to Its Consulate in Somaliland Ethiopia has appointed Teshome Shunde as the new ambassador to its consulate in Somaliland, a region it considers an autonomous territory. The Ethiopian Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced this decision, confirming that Ambassador Shunde will be stationed at the consulate office in Hargeisa, Somaliland. In a statement to the press, Ambassador Taye Atske Selassie, Ethiopia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, acknowledged the appointment. Although the minister did not provide specific details, other officials from the ministry confirmed that Teshome Shunde, who previously served in Kenya, has been appointed to lead the Ethiopian consulate in Somaliland. Reports from Somaliland indicate that Ambassador Teshome Shunde has already presented his credentials to President Muse Bihi of Somaliland, marking the official start of his diplomatic mission. Ambassador Teshome Shunde’s appointment follows a tradition of Ethiopia maintaining a consulate in Somaliland, where diplomatic representatives have held the position of full ambassador. This appointment also reflects Ethiopia’s ongoing diplomatic engagement with Somaliland, a region that has been self-governing for several years but has not been internationally recognized as an independent state. Ethiopia’s consulate in Somaliland has historically been led by special envoys, and until recently, this position was held by Ambassador Dalil Kedr. His appointment as a full ambassador was confirmed by President Sahle-Work Zewde of Ethiopia last June during a broader reshuffle of diplomatic posts within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Ambassador Lencho Bati Denied Accreditation by the U.S. Government

Ambassador Lencho Bati Denied Accreditation by the U.S. Government Thursday, August 29, 2024: Reports indicate that Ambassador Lencho Bati, who was recently appointed as Ethiopia’s ambassador to the United States, has been denied accreditation by the U.S. government. This decision comes just weeks after Ambassador Lencho was recalled from his previous post in Saudi Arabia and selected to represent Ethiopia in Washington, D.C. According to sources, the U.S. government has requested that Ambassador Lencho return to Ethiopia, stating that they would not accept his appointment. The reason behind this decision is reportedly linked to past legal issues that Ambassador Lencho faced while living in the United States years ago. Although details of these allegations have not been disclosed, the sources suggest that the matters are part of public records in the U.S. “The Americans have informed the Ethiopian government that they do not wish to have the ambassador serve in their country due to these past legal issues,” the sources said. So far, there has been no official confirmation or explanation from the Ethiopian government regarding this matter. The U.S. is known to have stringent criteria for accepting foreign ambassadors, and in several instances, they have declined to accredit diplomats from various countries. This development adds a new layer of complexity to Ethiopia’s diplomatic relations with the U.S., particularly at a time when both countries are navigating sensitive political and economic discussions.

Ethiopia Responds to Escalating Tensions in the Horn of Africa Following Egypt-Somalia Security Pact

Ethiopia Responds to Escalating Tensions in the Horn of Africa Following Egypt-Somalia Security Pact The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has released a statement addressing the current developments in the Horn of Africa, particularly in light of the recent military aid delivered by Egypt to Somalia. This move has heightened tensions in the region, with significant implications for Ethiopia. The impending establishment of a new peacekeeping mission by the African Union (ATMIS) in Somalia, along with Egypt’s recent military aid to Somalia, has raised concerns for Ethiopia regarding its potential impact on the stability of the Horn of Africa. At a time when the African Union and the United Nations are preparing for this new transition, the region is facing challenges that threaten its stability. Despite repeated calls and concerns from Ethiopia and other countries that have deployed troops under the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM), these concerns have not been adequately addressed. Ethiopia is particularly concerned about the implications of Egypt’s military involvement in Somalia, especially given the historical tensions between Ethiopia and Egypt over the construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) on the Nile River. Ethiopia views Egypt’s recent actions, including the signing of a security pact with Somalia and the delivery of military aid, as a deliberate attempt to destabilize the region. The Mogadishu government, which has aligned itself with Egypt, has threatened to expel Ethiopian troops who are part of the peacekeeping mission unless the Somaliland deal is canceled. This move by Somalia, coupled with Egypt’s support, could lead to further instability in the region. Ethiopia remains vigilant and closely monitors any developments that could threaten the region’s national security. It is important to note that Ethiopia will not remain silent while other actors take steps to undermine the stability of the Horn of Africa. Ethiopia is committed to promoting peace and stability in Somalia and the surrounding region, continuing its efforts to foster cooperation and mutual understanding among the peoples of the region. Ethiopia will also actively participate in any upcoming dialogue platforms aimed at resolving its current differences with the Somali government. Positive outcomes from these discussions have already been observed. However, the Somali government appears to be collaborating with foreign powers, including Egypt, that aim to destabilize the region rather than focusing on strengthening peace efforts. The responsibility for organizing and authorizing the new peacekeeping mission in Somalia lies with the relevant bodies, and they should give due consideration to the legitimate concerns of countries that have previously contributed troops to the region. Those who seek to destabilize the region for short-term gains and self-serving agendas will ultimately bear the consequences of their actions. Ethiopia will not tolerate actions that endanger its hard-won successes against both local and international extremist groups. Ethiopia maintains a firm stance in favor of peaceful resolutions and, in cooperation with the Somali people and the international community, remains committed to safeguarding the region’s peace and stability. Background on Egypt-Somalia Relations On August 28, 2024, Reuters reported that Egypt delivered its first military aid to Somalia in over four decades, following the signing of a security pact between the two nations earlier this month. This development has strained relations between Somalia and Ethiopia, particularly after Ethiopia’s recent agreement with the breakaway region of Somaliland, which Somalia views as a violation of its sovereignty. Egypt’s involvement in Somalia, including the potential deployment of troops along the Ethiopian border, has raised concerns about a possible proxy conflict in the region. Turkey has attempted to mediate the situation, hosting two rounds of indirect talks between Somalia and Ethiopia, with a third round expected soon. The Ethiopian Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ statement highlights the broader implications of these developments and reaffirms Ethiopia’s commitment to regional stability and security. August 28, 2024Office of the SpokespersonMinistry of Foreign AffairsAddis Ababa, Ethiopia

Elias Driba Bedane: A Criminal History Resurfaces Amid Terrorism Allegations

Elias Driba Bedane: A Criminal History Resurfaces Amid Terrorism Allegations Elias Driba Bedane, one of the six individuals recently arrested on suspicion of terrorism and violation of civil aviation law, has a complex criminal history that dates back several decades. Over the years, Elias, who has used multiple aliases including Dawit Driba Bedane and Jamal Nuru, has been implicated in a range of serious criminal activities, making his case particularly notable in the context of Ethiopian law enforcement. Criminal History Overview: Elias Driba’s criminal activities were first recorded in Addis Ababa between 1989 and 1999, during which he was accused of participating in a series of high-profile crimes. His charges include: Armed Robbery: He was involved in multiple counts of violent robberies targeting businesses and residences, often involving the use of force. Extortion: Elias engaged in coercive practices to extract money or goods from victims, threatening them with violence or other consequences. Theft: He committed numerous instances of stealing property and assets from various individuals and entities across Addis Ababa. Burglary: Elias frequently broke into homes and businesses with the intent to commit theft or other crimes. Trespassing: His criminal record includes several instances of illegally entering private property without permission. Murder: One of the most severe charges against him, Elias was accused of multiple counts of murder during his criminal activities, which significantly heightened the public and legal concern surrounding his actions. Embezzlement: He was also involved in the misappropriation of funds or property entrusted to his care, further adding to his long list of offenses. Forgery: Elias was known for falsifying documents and signatures to deceive and commit fraud. Escape from Custody: On multiple occasions, Elias managed to escape from detention or prison, evading capture and continuing his criminal activities. Using Multiple Aliases: To avoid detection, Elias used different identities, including Dawit Driba Bedane and Jamal Nuru, making it difficult for law enforcement to track his activities. Legal Proceedings and Sentencing:Following his arrest in the late 1990s, Elias Driba, under the alias Dawit Driba Bedane, faced multiple trials in the 2nd Criminal Court of the Federal High Court. The court proceedings were extensive, covering a wide array of charges. On December 25, 1999, Elias was sentenced to death three times for crimes including robbery, extortion, theft, burglary, and murder. The severity of these sentences underscored the gravity of his actions and their impact on the community. However, the legal process did not conclude with these sentences. Elias’s legal team filed appeals, and after further judicial review, the court commuted his death sentences to life imprisonment. This commutation was part of a broader legal process that took into account various factors, including the appeal arguments presented by his defense. Despite the commutation, Elias remained a significant figure within the prison system, and his case continued to draw attention from both legal authorities and the public. Recent Arrest and Charges: The recent arrest of Elias Driba Bedane, along with five other individuals, on charges related to terrorism and civil aviation law violations, has brought his past back into focus. The circumstances of his arrest suggest that Elias may have been involved in activities that posed a threat to national security, although the full details of the case are still being investigated by the relevant authorities. Elias’s involvement in this case, given his criminal history, raises questions about the potential connections between his past criminal activities and the current charges. Law enforcement agencies are conducting a thorough investigation to determine the nature and extent of his alleged involvement in terrorism-related activities. This investigation includes reviewing his past criminal records and any associations that may have persisted over the years. Public and Legal Implications: The case has attracted considerable media attention, both within Ethiopia and internationally, due to the nature of the charges and Elias Driba’s criminal history. The public response has been one of concern, particularly regarding the implications of his alleged involvement in terrorism after having been previously convicted of such serious crimes. The legal community is also closely watching the case, as it presents complex questions about the management and rehabilitation of individuals with extensive criminal backgrounds. Moreover, the case highlights broader issues within the Ethiopian judicial and correctional systems, particularly regarding the monitoring and potential recidivism of individuals who have been convicted of serious crimes. The commutation of Elias’s death sentences to life imprisonment, while a legal decision based on appeals, has led to discussions about the effectiveness of such decisions in preventing future criminal behavior. Elias Driba Bedane’s recent arrest on terrorism charges, in the context of his extensive criminal history, represents a significant moment in Ethiopian law enforcement. The case underscores the challenges faced by the legal system in managing individuals with a history of serious criminal activities and the importance of continued vigilance in monitoring such individuals. As the investigation unfolds, it will be crucial to determine the full extent of his involvement and to ensure that justice is served in a manner that upholds both the rule of law and public safety.

Diplomatic Intervention: U.S. Ambassador Ervin Masinga Steps In to Resolve TPLF Crisis

Diplomatic Intervention: U.S. Ambassador Ervin Masinga Steps In to Resolve TPLF Crisis Ervin Masinga Steps In to Ease Tension Between TPLF and Interim Administration Leaders On Monday, August 20, 2016 (New Morning), U.S. Ambassador to Ethiopia, Ervin Masinga, took diplomatic action to mitigate the escalating tensions between the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), led by Dr. Debretsion Gebremichael, and the interim administration headed by President Getachew Reda. This intervention comes at a critical moment, as the TPLF recently commenced its 14th conference, led by its chairman, Dr. Debretsion Gebremichael. The conference, which began on August 13, 2024, in Hawelti and is scheduled to run until August 17, 2024, has sparked significant controversy. The event has led to the absence of several central committee members, including Vice Chairman Getachew Reda, due to protests and other concerns. Notably, the National Election Board of Ethiopia (NEBE) and the TPLF’s own Central Control Commission have refused to recognize the conference. NEBE has explicitly stated that any decisions made at the General Assembly would be invalid without its approval. Vice Chairman Getachew Reda has voiced strong concerns, stating, “This assembly has nothing more than putting Tigray and its people in danger.” In a statement released shortly before Masinga’s visit, Getachew criticized the conference as an effort to oust certain leaders under a hastily organized and non-consensual agenda. He warned that the assembly’s actions could undermine the Tigrayan people’s struggle and lead to future conflicts, stressing that the process had been manipulated by a select group for narrow interests. Getachew assured that he would continue to fight alongside the people of Tigray to ensure peace and security, advocating for organized political negotiations and the restoration of the TPLF’s legitimacy. On the other hand, Dr. Leges Tulu, Minister of Government Communication Services, expressed his disapproval on social media, emphasizing the importance of law and order. He stated, “Any country in any corner of the world is governed by law and order,” and warned that any political movement failing to respect these principles ultimately faces destruction. Leges condemned the TPLF’s actions, accusing it of undermining the peace in Tigray and failing to adhere to the Pretoria Agreement, which obligates strict compliance with federal laws. He declared that the TPLF had been effectively destroyed by its own actions and held the group responsible for any resulting instability. As Ambassador Masinga arrived in Mekelle, he was welcomed by President Getachew Reda and Vice President General Tadesse Werede. His visit is expected to include discussions on the current political landscape in Tigray, the return of displaced persons, and the ongoing friction between the leadership groups led by Dr. Debretsion Gebremichael. The outcome of these discussions could have significant implications for the future stability of Tigray, as both stakeholders have raised serious concerns about the potential consequences of the ongoing conference and the deep divisions within the region’s leadership.

TikTok Influencer Among Six Arrested as Federal Police Unveil Terrorism Investigation

TikTok Influencer Among Six Arrested as Federal Police Unveil Terrorism Investigation The Federal Police have announced the initiation of a terrorist investigation against six suspects accused of violating aviation regulations, leading to chaos and harassment on a flight scheduled to travel from Addis Ababa to Mekele. The suspects have been identified as: Yohannes Daniel Berhe Amanuel Mewecha Aberha Natnael Wondowsen Shume Elias Deriba Bedane Yodiya Netsanet Abebe Eleni Kinfe Tekeleab Among the suspects is Yohannes Daniel Berhe, a famous social media influencer who is particularly active on TikTok. Yohannes has gained attention for live-streaming his encounters with airport staff and security personnel during the incident, further exacerbating the situation. His actions have drawn widespread attention on social media, with many questioning his motives and the impact of his behavior on the incident. According to records from the Federal Police Criminal Investigation Bureau, the suspects allegedly caused a disturbance that prevented the plane from taking off. This disruption, reportedly exacerbated by natural factors, has led to their criminal liability under the law. In addition to the criminal investigation, the suspects are also being scrutinized for possible terrorist activities. The investigation suggests that they may have been acting under orders from Unknown forces. Despite pleas from the airline and security forces for patience, the suspects allegedly persisted in promoting their hidden agenda, according to the investigation records. The Federal Police Criminal Investigation Bureau expressed regret that, instead of using social media for positive purposes, the suspects chose to undermine the pride of their country and its national airline. The six suspects, currently in custody, are scheduled to appear in court tomorrow, August 26, 2024, to face charges related to the violation of both domestic and international flight procedures, as well as terrorism charges. Tags ethiopia news ethiopia news today ethiopian airlines ethiopian news

Behind-the-Scenes in the GERD Diplomacy: Turkey’s Pivotal Role in the Standoff Between Ethiopia and Egypt

Behind-the-Scenes in the GERD Diplomacy: Turkey’s Pivotal Role in the Standoff Between Ethiopia and Egypt By- Asrat Birhanu @renaissancedam Recent diplomatic activities, primarily kept from the public eye, reveal Turkey’s role in the ongoing dispute between Ethiopia and Egypt over the Renaissance Dam. As Ethiopia’s second-largest investor after China, Turkey’s economic and military involvement is substantial, with more than 200 Turkish companies operating there as of 2022. Additionally, Turkey provided crucial military support to Ethiopia, which played a decisive role in helping the Ethiopian government secure victory in the recent civil conflict. Turkey has previously offered to mediate border disputes between Sudan and Ethiopia, showing its interest in maintaining regional stability. Now, Ankara is using its influence to broker a potential compromise between Ethiopia and Egypt over the GERD—a project essential for Ethiopia’s development that Egypt views with growing concern. Hakan Fidan’s Diplomatic Shuttle Turkey’s Foreign Minister, Hakan Fidan, has been actively engaged in shuttle diplomacy, visiting Addis Ababa and Cairo to deliver messages between the two governments. His recent trip to Cairo, following discussions in Addis Ababa, signals a possible thawing of relations between Egypt and Ethiopia, with Turkey playing a central mediating role. In July 2024, Egypt’s intelligence chief, Abbas Kamel, reached out to Turkey, showing Egypt’s desire for a mediator who could influence Ethiopia. Recognizing Turkey’s significant investments and position, Egypt sought Ankara’s help to resolve the standoff. Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly even mentioned that secret talks had been held with Turkey about the dam, highlighting the behind-the-scenes efforts to find a solution. During his visit to Egypt, Fidan is also reportedly working on arranging a future meeting between Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara, which could further the dialogue initiated during Erdogan’s previous visit to Cairo. Ethiopia’s Firm Stand and Egypt’s Desperate Pleas However, the messages exchanged between Egypt and Ethiopia reveal a deep and ongoing rift. Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed has been persistent in his refusal to commit to specific water shares for Egypt, rejecting the outdated colonial notion that Egypt has any right to a fixed allocation of the Nile’s water—whether during the GERD’s filling or its subsequent operation. Ethiopia maintains that the Blue Nile’s waters, Originating from Ethiopian rainfall, are a natural resource that Ethiopia has every right to use, just as other countries utilize their oil or natural gas. In response, Egyptian officials have communicated their usual  “red lines” to Addis Ababa, warning that a certain level of water deficit is unacceptable and could escalate the dispute. They added that Egypt’s position remains that the solution lies in a negotiated agreement regulating the GERD’s filling and operation, supposedly balancing the interests of upstream and downstream nations. However, this position ignores the reality that Egypt contributes nothing to the Nile’s flow and continues to cling to a colonial-era mindset that is both unjust and outdated. Conclusion: Ethiopia’s Just and Logical Stance Versus Egypt’s Colonialist Demands Ethiopia’s stance on the  Renaissance Dam is logical and justifiable. As the primary source of the Blue Nile, Ethiopia has a legitimate right to utilize its waters for its development. Egypt’s demands, deeply rooted in outdated colonial-era agreements, are unreasonable and fail to reflect the modern reality that Egypt contributes nothing to the Nile’s flow. This sense of entitlement is a profound injustice that disregards contemporary dynamics and Ethiopia’s sovereignty. In any unilateral negotiations with Egypt, Ethiopia should remain firm in applying the fait accompli policy. This strategy ensures that Ethiopia’s interests are safeguarded and not compromised by Egypt’s unfounded demands. The ultimate resolution should be aligned with the Entebbe Agreement, a pivotal accord among Nile Basin countries that promotes equitable and reasonable use of the Nile’s waters. This agreement should serve as a basis to compel Egypt to sign the CFA and formally recognize Ethiopia’s rights. The need for a fair resolution is urgent, and it is in the best interest of all parties involved. If these negotiations are genuinely based on mutual concessions, it raises the question: What is Egypt prepared to offer? Egypt appears to engage in these talks solely to gain, without contributing to the discussion or the flow of the Nile. Ethiopia’s position goes beyond merely defending its rights—it is about challenging and rectifying the colonial-era inequities that have long allowed downstream nations like Egypt to exert undue control over the Nile’s waters. No nation that does not contribute to the Nile should have the authority to impose conditions that infringe upon Ethiopia’s sovereignty and rightful use of its natural resources.